About

KeeperHub is the execution and reliability layer for AI agents operating onchain. Agents are great at reasoning, but they hit a wall when they need to actually move value: failed transactions, gas spikes, MEV extraction, zero guarantees. We're the infrastructure they plug into for guaranteed onchain execution with retry logic, gas optimization, private routing, and full audit trails.

Already powering Sky Protocol (formerly MakerDAO). Agents and developers connect natively via MCP, CLI, and agents can pay autonomously via x402 or MPP.

Every deployment is backed by 24/7 global engineering support.

We're building the standard for agent execution infrastructure: reliable, auditable, human-supported.

Prizes

šŸ’š Best Use of KeeperHub āøŗ $4,500
šŸ„‡
1st place
$2,500
🄈
2nd place
$1,500
šŸ„‰
3rd place
$500

š—§š˜„š—¼ š—³š—¼š—°š˜‚š˜€ š—®š—æš—²š—®š˜€, š—¼š—»š—² š—æš—®š—»š—øš—²š—± š—½š—æš—¶š˜‡š—² š—½š—¼š—¼š—¹. š—•š—²š˜€š˜ š˜„š—¼š—æš—ø š˜„š—¶š—»š˜€ š—æš—²š—“š—®š—æš—±š—¹š—²š˜€š˜€ š—¼š—³ š˜„š—µš—¶š—°š—µ š—®š—æš—²š—® š˜†š—¼š˜‚ š—Æš˜‚š—¶š—¹š—± š—¶š—».

🟢 š—™š—¼š—°š˜‚š˜€ š—”š—æš—²š—® šŸ­: š—•š—²š˜€š˜ š—œš—»š—»š—¼š˜ƒš—®š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—² š—Øš˜€š—² š—¼š—³ š—žš—²š—²š—½š—²š—æš—›š˜‚š—Æ.

Show us something we haven't seen before. Use KeeperHub's execution layer in a way that solves a real problem, whether that's an • agent, • a workflow, • a dApp, • a dev tool, • or something entirely new.

š—Ŗš—µš—®š˜ š—°š—¼š˜‚š—»š˜š˜€: any project that uses KeeperHub (MCP server or CLI) in a meaningful way. No format restrictions. If it works and solves a real problem, it qualifies.

🟢 š—™š—¼š—°š˜‚š˜€ š—”š—æš—²š—® šŸ®: š—•š—²š˜€š˜ š—œš—»š˜š—²š—“š—æš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—» š˜„š—¶š˜š—µ š—žš—²š—²š—½š—²š—æš—›š˜‚š—Æ.

Connect KeeperHub to something. Build the bridge so other developers don't have to. Two potential angles:

• š—£š—®š˜†š—ŗš—²š—»š˜š˜€. Integrate KeeperHub with payment rails like x402 or MPP. Show how agents can pay for services, settle transactions, or route payment flows into KeeperHub execution.

• š—”š—“š—²š—»š˜ frameworks and tools. Build a plugin, connector, or SDK integration for ElizaOS, OpenClaw, LangChain, CrewAI, or any framework with an active builder community.

🟢 š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—¶š—»š—“ š—°š—æš—¶š˜š—²š—æš—¶š—®: • Does it work? • Would someone actually use it? Real utility over novelty. • Depth of KeeperHub integration • Mergeable quality: clean code, clear documentation, working examples

Qualification Requirements

š—˜š—®š—°š—µ š˜€š˜‚š—Æš—ŗš—¶š˜€š˜€š—¶š—¼š—» š—ŗš˜‚š˜€š˜ š—¶š—»š—°š—¹š˜‚š—±š—²: • A working demo, live or recorded • A public GitHub repository with a README covering setup and architecture • A brief write-up explaining the approach and how KeeperHub is used • Project name, team members, and contact info

šŸ” Builder Feedback Bounty āøŗ $500
Up to 2 teams will receive $250

🟢 A separate bounty for builders who give us honest, actionable feedback while integrating KeeperHub during the hackathon. Open to any team that uses KeeperHub, whether or not they place in the main prize pool.

We want feedback that helps us make KeeperHub better. • UX and UI friction, • reproducible bugs, • documentation gaps that slowed you down, • feature requests that would have made your build easier. This isn't a consolation prize. Honest feedback from builders working under time pressure is some of the most valuable product input we get.

š—§š˜„š—¼ š˜„š—¶š—»š—»š—²š—æš˜€, $šŸ®šŸ±šŸ¬ š—²š—®š—°š—µ.

Qualification Requirements

š—¦š˜‚š—Æš—ŗš—¶š˜€š˜€š—¶š—¼š—»š˜€ š—ŗš˜‚š˜€š˜ š—°š—¼š˜ƒš—²š—æ š—®š˜ š—¹š—²š—®š˜€š˜ š—¼š—»š—² š—¼š—³ š˜š—µš—² š—³š—¼š—¹š—¹š—¼š˜„š—¶š—»š—“:

• UX or UI friction: what was confusing, slow, or unclear when using KeeperHub • Reproducible bugs: issues with clear steps to replicate • Documentation gaps: where the docs left you stuck • Feature requests: what's missing that would have made the build easier

Feedback must be specific and actionable. Generic praise or vague criticism will not qualify.